iluya: Sagt mal bin ich der einzige bei dem Pokerstars das varianzreichste ist was es gibt? Auf die letzten 25k Hands mit AA KK AK QQ AQ AJ. PokerStars Is Rigged (English Edition) eBook: Joy, Matthew: qualityrockers.com: Kindle-Shop. Habe schon oft beim spiel bemerkt, wenn ich ein Tournament und Cash game gleichzeitig spiele, dass ich VIEL, VIEL bessere Karten konstant beim Turnier.
Is Online Poker Rigged for Action? | The Definitive AnswerBei jedem Casino kann man das Zertifikat einsehen,bei Pokerstars nicht! Im Live Casino bescheissen sie genauso qualityrockers.com Blackjack,wenn man eine gute. iluya: Sagt mal bin ich der einzige bei dem Pokerstars das varianzreichste ist was es gibt? Auf die letzten 25k Hands mit AA KK AK QQ AQ AJ. Untersucht wurden die Anbieter PokerStars, PartyPoker und OnGame. Die Methode der Untersuchung war folgende: Die Handdaten wurden.
Pokerstars Rigged Recommended Posts VideoDO I THINK POKERSTARS IS RIGGED?! - 10$ TO 1000$ CHALLENGE! - DAY 127
Und das Pokerstars Rigged zurГckbuchen. - 18 AntwortenYou will lose, no matter how good you are or what calls you make.
Well to some degree it is and you will have the read the next lines to find out why. Besides their countless horror hands that you can experience yourself by just grinding online poker and some very questionable plays in the process basically how NOT to play your big hands , Fuckpokerstars.
The outcome was 1,, tournament hands selected and analyzed carefully. According to Fuckpokerstars. Moreover, in the Ax vs. And the Ax vs. Aces galore on PokerStars right?
Well, for one who has played a fair amount of tournaments on PokerStars as of late, this is not quite news. And yes, you would even agree that the action postflop is way over the limit - big hands running into bigger and bigger and bigger hands - compared to some other smaller online poker sites.
But does this mean PokerStars is rigged? Or maybe, just maybe, our process thinking is actually flawed?
Yes, it is true, ALL online poker sites, including PS, need to be audited seriously by public organizations that actually care about the safety of its citizens and not by private companies based on some financial heavens like the Fuckpokerstars.
But to call PokerStars scammy is way over-the-top. What we should do first is actually look in the mirror, study our play and see what we have actually done wrong and how we could have played a certain hand better.
And since you want to play on the biggest poker site of them all, don't forget to think about variance as well - you will play MTTs on PokerStars against thousands of players so you will have to win many, many flips not to mention give several bad beats in the process to emerge victorious.
However, if you play on a smaller site with only several hundred players per MTT, you will have to win way less hands in order to reach the top of the ladder.
Bigger hands situations. Just take a deck of cards, shuffle it yourself, deal like in a regular Holdem game and behold the RNG in action.
How many bad beats did you see? What do you think? Is PokerStars rigged? Firstly we found that a huge number, in fact almost all of eastern Europeans were able to speak perfect english and use the correct dialect, as we purposely engaged them in conversation.
Strange but not impossible, maybe they had exceptional teachers. All our researchers played conservatively and as we approached the business end of the tournaments we really started to see some very strange betting patterns and unbelievable suck outs, bad beats.
Luckily with the introduction of boom player we were able to record what went on to support our findings. A player, lets call him player X made a small raise from mid position and was called by the cut off,one our our researchers lets call them all player R was holding pocket Aces and shoved all in, an immediate call from from player X risking his tournament life and a fold from the other player sat at the table.
Player X revealed hole cards of 3 6 os. The flop 4 5 7. Amazed at this play we searched the player and found him entered into 4 other similar games.
We observed his tables over the next hour or so and we began to see a pattern emerging. On one table 2 from the money he again went all in with 8 3 os only to get a call from a player holding AKs and hit a Full house on the flop.
Again amazed at what we saw we studied some of the other plays made by player X. We searched for the players data on all the big and smaller sites, sharkscope, pokerprolabs, playerscope etc and found nothing.
We all may have theories and can all see the benefits of a "rigged" site, after all they make money from rake and entry fees and there is a lot more we can go into regarding this but for now we just want to stick to the FACTS.
We will publish more data over the coming days. As mentioned previously we have detailed data, Boom replays to support our findings but would like to hear from anyone else who has experienced anything they feel could help support this research so we can present a full unbiased report to the DOJ.
It's not surprising you can find unusual play when you sift through a large amount of data. Some players like to gamble Also lol at the eastern European thing.
I've met quite a few via poker that I speak to on skype and they do all pretty much speak perfect English. You do know it's the number 1 most spoke language in the world right?
Unless you post who the poker players, statisticians and industry experts are, this has no legitimacy. Where is the summary of your analysis in statistical form?
Two threads merged and moved to bad beats. Please post any variance or bad beat related topics in the bad beat forum going forward.
Constructive comment, 36k hands is nothing, should be easy to get your hands on over 1 million "random" hands. Less constructive, but reality based comments.
I am not sure why the DOJ would care about this considering PokerStars isn't operating there, but I would hope that this biased study on a small sample size wouldn't sway them anyway.
This is another tin foil hat thread with no evidence being posted even in this tiny sample size. Love the bias in your OP despite the fact you insist on being unbiased.
It's perfectly acceptable to not post who is involved until the study is complete. Most people aren't even announcing stuff like this before the study is complete.
I had regged a few SCOOP events for tonight but after reading through the findings of your rigorous experiment I snap unregged. I didn't see Player X in the lobby but couldn't take the chance because those sneaky Eastern Europeans like to late-reg.
That's the point. If you're going to announce something as fact and then not provide any substantive evidence or provide the authors who might lend credibility if legitimate , then you shouldn't be making the post to begin with.
You want to hear a strange occurrence? I think not. Weird, eh? My findings astounded me. Strange betting patterns and unbelievable plays, yet he was somehow still winning pots.
AND he was able to speak perfect English and use the correct dialect, as I purposely engaged him in conversation. Just my 5 pence wurth ; I sincerely suggest that if house bots on are on the normal schedule whos the top mtt players playing all the time on the same tournaments.
I would like to think I actually could play all these suckers live ,its just a shame I blew my whole entire roll at highstakes plo and and mentally ill due to my 8 year losing run at onliner poker.
I used to own my casino ,even those pesky cameras never worked i got a good few tricks for them things these days. No more griping.
Oh, and be sure to use these tickets within 21 days or they disappear into the green felt graveyard where virtual bonuses go to die.
Finally, it shows trust in players rather than the poker site just covering its behind. Visit the PokerStars website and click the oversized button to begin the soft client download.
Both Windows and Mac desktop software is available. Install the software or app and launch it. Click the link to create your PokerStars account.
PokerStars has been throwing as much spaghetti against the wall as anyone over the past several years, hoping that something will stick to the nitty-nut-cracking recreational wall.
Introduced in this has been the most successful innovation and seems to have given them the confidence to try develop more. This is a 3-player winner-take-all hyper-turbo Sit and Go whew, what a mouthful that draws casual players thanks to its lottery element.
Due to the low starting chips and huge quickly-escalating blinds they feature an extremely low skill-to-luck edge.
These last a pre-defined 5 minutes with escalating blinds starting as soon as enough players have registered.
The Deal was launched in late with more controversy than even this get-off-my-lawn grizzly online veteran expected. Essentially, The Deal is a way to get players to gamble their StarsCoin with a poker facade and an illusion of player control.
Duel was a thinly-veiled attempt to grab a share of the casual Zynga-fueled mobile market and is best described as Words With Friends meets heads-up poker.
I remember a decent marketing campaign with PokerStars trotting out familiar faces like Negreanu and Moneymaker.
It was supposed to be the next big mobile poker thing. Turns out the casual audience is every bit as fickle as the nightmares of the marketing department fear they are.
Keep it up, PokerStars. Too many competitors are spinning their wheels. This is one of the few groups still trying to stay ahead of the curve.
Although it was once the weakest aspect of the poker room PokerStars has made a concerted effort to improve its promotional offerings in recent years.
While I understand the desire to let the quality of the software and games speak for themselves the non-US market has simply become too competitive with new player packages to offer half-baked incentives.
Secondly, players are given 6 months to clear the bonus through cash game or tournament play whereas most other poker rooms only give you a month or two.
There are 7 different VIP tiers that require as little as player points per month to earn or as many as 1,, per year.
As you reach higher tiers you have earn points more frequently and have access to better promotions.
The biggest criticism I have for the program is that players are forced to hit specific player point thresholds each and every month in order to maintain their tier in the VIP Club.
I personally like to hop around different poker rooms, spreading my playing time between whoever currently has the better cash games and promotions.
I understand that PokerStars wants to encourage regular play and they have always done an excellent job of cultivating player loyalty. While they have always offered free books, tournament tickets, and merchandise for player points PokerStars has beefed up the rewards in recent years.
Points can now be exchanged for cash and there are a number of private VIP freeroll tournaments taking place at least weekly. Wrapping up the promotional offerings are a number of region-specific events that are only offered for players in certain parts of the world such as Asia, Australia, Brazil, Latin America, Portugal, and Norway.
Although neither is truly better than those offered by their main competitors with the enormous number of games and tournaments offered getting anything extra is appreciated.
Life offers 3 certainties every day: the sun will rise, the sun will set, and the PokerStars cash games will be tighter than the Gordian knot.
That means fewer casual players dumping chips to the grinders just for the experience. PokerStars has always been the poker room du jour of the online poker elitist, wannabe poker pro, dedicated grinder, and serious tournament player.
The problem with that in the game quality context is that those are the tightest and most well-educated poker groups there are.
There is some degree of change as the games get slightly looser at the penny games rather than the dollar ones but even those micro limit players fight surprisingly hard for each penny.
Check my tips section for more thoughts.